tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8442430064359197279.post2682002406191601838..comments2024-03-26T10:03:51.827+13:00Comments on Karl du Fresne: Curran surprised? I don't think soKarl du Fresnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05054853925940134404noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8442430064359197279.post-66054301423418370252011-06-13T12:20:56.033+12:002011-06-13T12:20:56.033+12:00And let us not forget that the tactic is not limit...And let us not forget that the tactic is not limited to the women in the House - Winnie the Peters, Hone, and many many more; virtually every member who has been expelled from the House will have had this in mind.The probligohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17882103150181414348noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8442430064359197279.post-85825377838351009532011-06-13T10:36:55.745+12:002011-06-13T10:36:55.745+12:00During my time observing the pollies, Ruth Richard...During my time observing the pollies, Ruth Richardson milked for all it was worth, her lack of breast feeding facilities in parliament. That must have been 30 years or so ago. And before her (and my) time, Mabel Howard waved bloomers around in the chamber to prove some point or other. Each commanded coverage in their respective day. Curran is just following tradition, albeit by backing a team of serial losers, but that's another argument.John Spavinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05899215731976985580noreply@blogger.com