A few thoughts on the announcement that John Campbell will take over next year as co-host of RNZ’s Morning Report:
■ RNZ chief executive Paul Thompson had a choice. He could make a polarising appointment or a non-polarising one. He chose the former. In doing so, he gave the fingers to the large (and I suspect growing) number of New Zealanders who neither like Campbell nor trust him as an impartial journalist and commentator. Disregarding RNZ’s obligation to serve all New Zealanders, Thompson made an appointment that he must know will alienate people and almost certainly lead to a further loss of faith in RNZ. He didn't have to do it; there were alternatives.
■ Thompson is either tone-deaf or indifferent to public opinion. An alternative explanation is that he is a weak manager who has yielded to internal pressure to appoint someone the RNZ establishment will be comfortable with. Certainly Campbell will be seen as a compatible ideological fit with other leftist RNZ broadcasters. (I don’t know what Thompson’s personal political views are or whether he even has any, but they may have played no part in his decision.)
■ It’s not just Campbell’s politics that are polarising; it’s also his style as a broadcaster, which alternates between gushingly ingratiating and finger-waggingly pompous and condescending. He professes to be a man of the people and to speak for ordinary New Zealanders, but he’s not and he doesn’t. He proved that when he spectacularly spat the dummy in 2023 because his fellow New Zealanders elected a centre-right government.
■ According to Shayne Currie’s Media Insider column in the New Zealand Herald, RNZ says it’s confident that Campbell is committed to impartial journalism and “like all employees of RNZ, will be held to that high standard through our comprehensive editorial policy”. At best, this is meaningless PR flannel; at worst, it’s plain dishonest. If Campbell has demonstrated anything in recent years, it’s that he’s incapable of impartial journalism. He doesn’t even believe in impartial journalism.
■ Currie also reports that Campbell’s appointment was the subject of “robust discussion” by the RNZ board, but that the directors ultimately deferred to Thompson’s right as CEO to make the call. It’s not hard to surmise which board members are likely to have supported the appointment and which of them resisted it. Those in the former category are likely to be gone once their current terms expire, but by then the damage will have been done to RNZ’s already tarnished reputation.
Spot on Karl. Should drive even more listeners away although the hand wringers will be happy.
ReplyDeleteHear hear Karl
ReplyDeleteI was reflecting this morning on the Paul Holmes era...the last time we were pretty much all on 'the same page'? Can't stand JC since I watched him suck up to David Bain on the steps of the courthouse here at the 2nd trial acquittal. Yech!
ReplyDeleteJohn Campbell has somehow become Establishment almost, if I am allowed to use that word. Last man standing and all that. Iconic? No. Should we be grateful we didn’t get Patrick Gower?
ReplyDeleteI recommend an analysis of the "Boomer Journalism" that captured public broadcasting as early as the 1970s in Graham Majin's "Truthophobia" (2023). I made a summary in my review of Tim Watkin's "How to Rebuild Trust in Journalism" (https://www.nbr.co.nz/book-review/media-matters-rebuilding-public-trust/). Watkin works at RNZ. Majin was a former BBC journalist before turning to academia. His book is available on Kindle and is the best history I've seen of how the Victorian Liberal ethos of balanced and impartial ("who, what, where, when, how") journalism up to the 1960s was replaced by "why" - the desire to provide a narrative and solutions.
ReplyDeleteThat last comment was posted by Nevil Gibson, former managing editor of NBR. The clunky Blogger technology defeated his attempt to identify himself, as it has done with many others.
ReplyDelete