tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8442430064359197279.post4729266440340731779..comments2024-03-26T10:03:51.827+13:00Comments on Karl du Fresne: The case for journalistic objectivityKarl du Fresnehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05054853925940134404noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8442430064359197279.post-9962114954464228082013-01-28T12:38:45.149+13:002013-01-28T12:38:45.149+13:00I have a question. Like me it is fairly simple.
I...I have a question. Like me it is fairly simple.<br /><br />If we salute, instead of criticizing, the NZ Cricket team (and, I suppose the Wellington Phoenix) won't we be defeating the purpose so thoughtfully spelt out in your column?Tinmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02749937729383913466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8442430064359197279.post-55608623918442884462013-01-28T12:24:17.151+13:002013-01-28T12:24:17.151+13:00John Campbell is correct - there is no universal r...John Campbell is correct - there is no universal rule that journalists should be objective. There is also no rule that we have to watch, listen and read their execrable propaganda. That is why the mainstream media is in such dire financial straits all around the world.<br /><br />I didn't realise the intent of our national cricket team was to lose most of the time. Thanks for letting me in on the secret - I might start watching them again. <br /><br />Regarding your third point - refer to my first point above.Kiwiwithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10507667837257013301noreply@blogger.com