I have some sympathy for the public service union’s objection to TVNZ’s ban
on political journalists belonging to parties. The ban strikes me as an over-reaction
to an embarrassing failure that was partly of TVNZ’s own making. (I
say “partly” because Shane Taurima’s underhand behaviour was obviously the primary
contributing factor, despite his ludicrous claim to have been vindicated by the
report of an independent panel.)
Gavin Ellis, former editor-in-chief of the New Zealand Herald, argued on today’s Morning Report that journalists have to
make a choice between reporting on politics and belonging to a political party.
Some political journalists (I think Colin James is one) go even further to
ensure purity. They don’t vote.
But with all due respect to such principled views, I struggle to accept that
being a political journalist necessarily requires you to neuter yourself as a
citizen.
The crucial issue, surely, is how you do the job.
Journalists should be judged on the fairness and impartiality of their
reporting and commentary. It’s possible to be a party member and still be
even-handed as a journalist.
I can think of relatively high-profile journalists who hold
strong left-wing views in private but still manage to do their work with
integrity, as the journalists’ code of ethics requires. There are also journalists
and commentators (Paul Henry and John Campbell, for example) who quite
openly lean one way or the other – but since their politics are no secret,
viewers can decide for themselves how much weight to place on whatever they
might say.
These are not the people who worry me. The ones we
should really be concerned about are the journalists who hold pronounced political views
that are not declared, but which permeate their reportage. There are a lot of
them about, probably more than ever before, and they will never be controlled
by arbitrary rules – such as TVNZ is now imposing – about declarations of political
interest. If such people have no qualms about exercising bias in their work, they are not going to feel compelled to fess up to the boss. They are answerable only to their own conscience, which isn’t much help if they don’t possess one.
2 comments:
I disagree. I don't think that to show purity a journalists in whatever type of media needs to not vote but I fail to see why a journalist, especially one who deals in political matters (I can't see the politics in gardening or sports writing) should find it necessary to belong to political party. I do however prefer to know the political leanings of a journalist-at least I can judge their ability to comment knowing that unlike the ones who obvious lean one way or another and yet deny it.
I think that journalists should have to declare if they are involved with a political party. Having that information "up front" in the open would be very useful.
Post a Comment