(First published in the Manawatu Standard and on Stuff.co.nz, April 15.)
I’m writing this on a glorious Easter Sunday morning. From
where I sit in what I grandiosely refer to as my office, which in reality
resembles nothing so much as a medieval monk’s cell, I look out on the street.
It’s a good vantage point from which to observe a passing parade of walkers,
runners, cyclists and even horse riders.
Being on the edge of town, our street is semi-rural and
relatively quiet, which makes it popular with walkers. Some are regulars whose
faces are familiar to me. But in the weeks since the Covid-19 lockdown began,
the number of passers-by has multiplied.
I don’t recognise these new faces, which tells me they’re
from outside our neighbourhood or – far more likely – that they’re locals who either
don’t usually get the opportunity to go for a stroll or who, for one reason or
another, wouldn’t normally think of doing it.
It’s a lockdown phenomenon, then, but a beneficial one.
Eager for some fresh air and respite from being house-bound, people are taking
to the streets. In the process, they’re getting acquainted with their local
neighbourhoods, possibly for the first time.
I might add that they’re getting acquainted with their neighbours
too, because a psychological side-effect of the Covid-19 crisis is that people
suddenly feel a sense of communal solidarity – a feeling that we’re all in this
together. This has the effect of breaking down the barriers of reserve that
often deter people from exchanging greetings with strangers or striking up a
conversation with the person next door.
Another benign consequence of the lockdown is that the
absence of vehicles has made streets quieter and more pedestrian-friendly.
Walking is therefore not only more pleasurable, but it’s also generally safe to
step off the footpath in order to maintain social distancing from anyone coming
the other way.
And here’s something else. The people I see out walking
every day are a demographic cross-section, from the very young to the elderly.
But what’s especially noticeable is the number of young families out together, either
on foot or on bikes.
For many kids, having all this leisure time with their
parents must be something of a novelty. Those with working parents, which means
a very high proportion of New Zealand children, must relish having their mums
and dads home with them.
I imagine the eventual return to normality, if there is such a thing, will be just as tough for some parents, mothers
especially, as for their kids. There’s a widely
held view that mothers find being at home with their children stressful, but that’s
not universally true.
While it’s unfashionable to admit it, some resent being
forced by economic circumstances – or just as often, by social expectations – to
pursue careers, and would rather be full-time parents regardless of the
financial disadvantages.
And as it is for kids, so it is for dogs. Over the past two
weeks there’s been a steady procession of dogs and their owners past our front
gate – far more than I’d normally see.
Some of these will be dogs that usually get their exercise
in parks and open areas too distant to walk to and therefore off-limits under
the lockdown rules, but my guess is that many of them are normally left to languish
alone at home during the day. They too have reason to be delighted with the
lockdown and may be excused for sulking when they find themselves on their own
again.
As for people like my wife and me, being confined to
barracks is no great hardship. Social isolation is how many in our age group
live for much of the time anyway.
For those like us, the main challenge posed by the lockdown is a
psychological one, and a piffling one at that. Being forced to stay at home with only
our own company induces an unfamiliar state of ennui, which is best
described as a vague feeling of lethargy and listlessness arising from lack of
stimulation.
We have everything we need except that most precious and undervalued commodity, choice: choice about how to spend our time, who to spend it with, where to go and when. But the
fact that we normally enjoy such choice is a reminder of how privileged we
are. It can’t be compared with the hardship, loneliness and stress many people are
experiencing.
My wife and I have a guaranteed (if modest) income from the state, no
mortgage or rent to pay, no jobs and therefore no anxiety about losing them,
and no kids to keep engaged while the lockdown drags on.
In as much as anyone can have certainty in their lives, we
do. And it’s uncertainty, perhaps more than anything, that makes the
coronavirus crisis so worrisome: uncertainty about when and if it will be over,
and uncertainty about the huge social and economic damage that could be done in
the meantime.
2 comments:
Thanks Karl,
Once again you have written a clear and accurate portrait of life under the lock down. Like you, we are relatively independent, but we do feel for our children and nieces who have more to cope with.
We've read of the people for whom home-D was something to fear, they doubted their ability to keep themselves company, or even mentally balanced...'it'll do my head in' sort of thing. And the others for whom it's been a wonderful rest, a chance to pursue the stuff they are interested in without the daily grind getting in the way, to sleep in, to slob around in pjs or similar. I have far more friends for whom the latter is the case then the former. School hols were like this in our house, when we weren't going away. Your experience with locals is pretty typical I reckon Karl...I know I've made 2 new friends of locals normally busy 9-5 & we've met up in the streets or gardens. Homebodies are experts already. Just listened to Kim interviewing author Ann Patchett, who is loving her home environment more than ever...her nest. Silver linings, ill winds...some choices will be configured differently when the public health scare is better understood, and fearful for those worst affected.
Post a Comment