One News wasted more than four minutes of prime bulletin time
last night on a shrill beat-up about a banned gambler receiving text messages
from SkyCity “coaxing her back”.
The messages, promoting $50,000 sweepstakes draws, were sent
to the cellphone of Selina Watson, who had been barred from the casino after she
and her husband gambled nearly $50 million, $5.5 million of which wasn’t theirs.
The husband is now in prison for theft.
Reporter Lisa Owens breathlessly reported this as if the
text message was a deliberate, nefarious act of enticement on the part of the casino
when it seemed far more likely that Mrs Watson’s name had been included among the recipients
as the result of a careless mistake. I mean, why would SkyCity issue a trespass
notice to someone, then send them text messages inviting them back?
Mrs Watson was said to be “appalled”. She was making a new
life for herself, Owens declared indignantly (the journalist as advocate), and
wanted nothing to do with the casino. “It brought everything right back again,”
Mrs Watson whined.
We were clearly supposed to feel sorry for her. I didn’t. Anyone
would think SkyCity had coerced her into gambling $50 million in the first
place.
What especially intrigued me was that we were repeatedly
shown the text message received by Mrs Watson, at the bottom of which were the
words: “Txt STOP to stop SKYCITY txts”. In other words, all Mrs Watson needed
to do was send a one-word message back to SkyCity and she wouldn’t have been
bothered again. End of story.
Instead she chose to have herself presented in the media as a
helpless victim, a highly fashionable status these days, and in the process drew
the nation’s attention to an episode in her past that most viewers would have
been unaware of, and that most people in Mrs Watson’s position would probably prefer
to conceal. I can’t help wondering why.
I also can’t help wondering why a reporter, still less the
TVNZ news editors, would have thought there was a story in it.
To complete the silliness, I see SkyCity has now apologised.
So the cycle has been completed and television’s appetite for fake morality
tales has once again been satisfied.
"...she and her husband gambled nearly $50 million, $5.5 million of which wasn’t theirs."
ReplyDeleteSo, $44.5 million *was* theirs? (Presumably).
If that is the case, I wonder why they felt that they had to steal?
Anyway, this makes me very glad that I never watch TV. Well, almost never - I will watch the Olympics and I do try to see some sevens games. I never watch the news though. The media are really just a branch of the Labour Party now.