Friday, July 5, 2024

Here's the news: life will go on

I’ve asked this question before, but it’s time to ask it again: do TV journalists have any idea how precious and self-absorbed they look?

The evidence overwhelmingly suggests they don’t. Over the past couple of weeks we’ve witnessed an unedifying orgy of self-aggrandisement as Newshub journalists and broadcasters very publicly and ostentatiously mourn the imminent loss of their jobs.  

Paddy Gower, Mike McRoberts, Samantha Hayes, Lloyd Burr, Eric Young and Melissa Chan-Green have all invited us to share their grief, although Chan-Green, holding back tears, at least had the self-awareness to acknowledge that other people have faced tough times too.

Young, who I’ve always respected as a newsreader, deserves special mention for his maudlin display on a video released today. “There’ll be no time for self-indulgence,” he says of his final bulletin. Just as well, because we’ve seen far too much already.

It has been a strange combination of self-pity and self-celebration. The Newshub team are appealing for public sympathy while simultaneously bigging themselves up in a manner that many ordinary New Zealanders will find risibly over-the-top and more than a little self-centred.

They’re behaving as if they’re the first people ever to experience the trauma of losing their jobs, but of course it happens all the time. Businesses constantly fail, often with far more damaging consequences for those affected.

Untold thousands of unskilled and semi-skilled New Zealanders have been thrown out of jobs by technological change or economic upheaval and faced a far bleaker outlook than the relatively small number of skilled and talented people affected by the Newshub closure, some of whom have already acquired new and presumably well-paid jobs.

The difference, of course, is that all those anonymous victims of redundancy had no public platform from which to draw attention to their misfortune. Newshub journalists do, either via their own medium or through others in the media (such as the Herald’s Shayne Currie, who has assiduously reported all the hand-wringing). I’m sure it’s not lost on the public that they are exploiting a privileged position.

Yes, losing your job must be tough. It's also problematical, from a public interest standpoint, that there will be one less competitor in the news arena. But the Newshub journalists would probably win more sympathy, and certainly more respect, if they took it on the chin, just as thousands of anonymous workers had no choice but to do when they found themselves surplus to requirements.

I wonder, what makes the Newshub employees so special that their fate warrants all this wailing and breast-beating? What makes them think they have more emotionally invested in their work than all those other poor stiffs who fell victim to the cruel caprice of changing markets? An obvious explanation is that television is a uniquely ego-stroking medium. It can create the illusion, at least within the bubble of those working in the business, that the lives of the people who report and deliver the news are themselves a matter of vital public interest. Fatally, they come to regard themselves as celebrities.

It’s worth noting that this overweening egotism and sense of entitlement doesn’t afflict all journalists. Hundreds of print journalists have lost their jobs in recent years, with serious consequences for the public’s right to know what’s going on in their communities. They went quietly, without public fuss. What is it that makes TV journalists think their role is so uniquely precious?  

Similarly, when the Evening Post ceased to exist as a title when it was merged with The Dominion in 2002, it marked its own passing with a one-off commemorative issue that was notably light on self-congratulations. Hardly a word was published about the individuals who produced the paper. It was largely left to readers and public figures to write about what the Post had meant to them and to Wellington. (And bear in mind, this was a newspaper that had been an essential part of Wellington life for 137 years. Newshub, by way of contrast, came into existence only 35 years ago and was never more than a secondary player in its market.)

Well, here’s the news, to coin a phrase: life will go on. A timeline of Newshub’s history, published today in the Herald, graphically demonstrates that TV news and current affairs programmes come and go and are soon forgotten. The timeline serves as a striking reminder that television is essentially an ephemeral medium. Many of the shows mentioned have long since faded from the public memory, along with the names of the people who presented them. The same will happen to the 6 o’clock Newshub News, and possibly sooner than many of its grieving employees imagine.

Footnote (appended July 7): On Muriel Newman's Breaking Views page, a commenter named Gaynor responded to this piece by wondering where the mainstream media were when good people were losing their jobs because they chose not to have the Covid jab. No sympathy for them. A good point that I wish I'd thought of.

9 comments:

  1. It has been humorous in a way watching NewsHub Staff bewailing the rest of us losing their enlightened views....The lack of self awareness has been colossal.

    I haven't seen them report in such emotional terms on the endless cycle of down sizing and redundancies that have been occurring at Spark since the end of 2011 - thats right since Oct 2011 Spark has had restructure after restructure shedding staff.

    And that is just one example

    So I have zero sympathy for NewsHub staff losing their jobs, just as I have no sympathy for Public Servants losing their jobs. its nice to see the the Elites handmaidens meet the cold, harsh reality the rest of us deal with all the damn time

    ReplyDelete
  2. Perhaps these journalists didn’t have the direction from tutors at journalism school I did - your role is to report the news, not make it; you’re writing it not starring in it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mike McRoberts on the reasons for the demise of Newshub:
    "People have their opinions; they're wrong".

    ReplyDelete
  4. Three News was always from its start in 1989 more willing to take a risk than the ever-staid One News. It sometimes surprised. I can't ever recall being surprised by One News. The behemoth that bought Three has now contracted Stuff to provide a much cheaper bulletin made by Stuff. The cheapness doesn't worry me, it's Stuff that does. Stuff is the worst of all our remaining mainstream media for slanting the news and only reporting what its staff believe the public should be allowed to know. There are entire subjects that Stuff will not cover, and important issues it is committed only to giving one slanted "side" of. So the demise of Newshub is more than just another 300 journos and production staff losing their jobs, it is the loss of an independent and at times fearless news service and its replacement with one that seems to think 1984 is its instruction manual.

    ReplyDelete
  5. David,
    In the days when I still watched the TV news, Newshub was my channel of choice. On the rare occasions when saw 1 News, I kept expecting to hear the Play School theme tune.
    It's true that Newshub had some very good reporters. Michael Morrah always impressed me and Lisette Raymer did some outstanding work in Europe. On the other hand, there were Tova O'Brien, Jenna Lynch and Kate Rogers, any one of whom could send me screaming from the room.
    In any event, as you would appreciate, my post wasn't about the worth (or otherwise) of Newshub's journalism.

    ReplyDelete
  6. David George sums up the attitude of the msm elites in my view : Mike McRoberts on the reasons for the demise of Newshub:
    "People have their opinions; they're wrong".
    And being wrong, they should not be given oxygen, meeting places or coverage.
    The ''journalists'' on TV bemoan their demise because the public are being deprived of the vanguard of correct-thought shaping ''news'', by ''fearlessly independent journalists'' battling for fairness, equality and (part-) Maori indigenous rights and ''trans'' rights against the new three-headed nasty, racist, bigotted , colonialist, imperialist, white supremacist govt with Uncle Toms on board , a govt that Aotearoans elected using the Westminster system, an evil, colonialist concept that must be re-imagined to ensure it never happens again. I think that sums them up.
    Oh and by the way they need taxpayer support from people of all views , through a so-called journalism fund, to work towards that end.
    -Paul P

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just catching up on what I've missed, credit to David Harvey for clueing me in & a real bonus in my day thanks kARL.
    The new 3 news lasted until the mobster appeared at dinnertime...gave it a shot, won't now return.
    Fantastic comments on the earlier pieces I'd missed...can't add much. I now find there is so much quality out there in various guises I have to drag myself away from the PC...sad!

    ReplyDelete
  8. And did they all miss the sleight of hand of their ex benefactor ?

    While they are awash in the histrionics of the death throes of their acting careers, the Truth behind the Podium travels the world enjoying adulation and financial rewards from the marxist toadys who sponsored her political gestation.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Apologies for late comment. This television culture is aided and abetted by print media. Shayne currie’s performance in covering the dying days of newshub was nausea- inducing. So was stuff’s by allowing a stream of self-promoting spiel from the execrable excuse for a journalist, paddy Gower as he sought to justify to potential employers why he deserved a job.
    But Currie and stuff proceeded to lower the bar with a minute by minute live coverage of newshub’s final broadcast — treating them like royalty! Yet the many People who lose jobs everyday certainly don’t get the same treatment.

    ReplyDelete