Friday, December 19, 2025

RNZ's boss gives New Zealand the fingers

A few thoughts on the announcement that John Campbell will take over next year as co-host of RNZ’s Morning Report:

■ RNZ chief executive Paul Thompson had a choice. He could make a polarising appointment or a non-polarising one. He chose the former. In doing so, he gave the fingers to the large (and I suspect growing) number of New Zealanders who neither like Campbell nor trust him as an impartial journalist and commentator. Disregarding RNZ’s obligation to serve all New Zealanders, Thompson made an appointment that he must know will alienate people and almost certainly lead to a further loss of faith in RNZ. He didn't have to do it; there were alternatives.

■ Thompson is either tone-deaf or indifferent to public opinion. An alternative explanation is that he is a weak manager who has yielded to internal pressure to appoint someone the RNZ establishment will be comfortable with. Certainly Campbell will be seen as a compatible ideological fit with other leftist RNZ broadcasters. (I don’t know what Thompson’s personal political views are or whether he even has any, but they may have played no part in his decision.)

■ It’s not just Campbell’s politics that are polarising; it’s also his style as a broadcaster, which alternates between gushingly ingratiating and finger-waggingly pompous and condescending. He professes to be a man of the people and to speak for ordinary New Zealanders, but he’s not and he doesn’t. He proved that when he spectacularly spat the dummy in 2023 because his fellow New Zealanders elected a centre-right government.

■ According to Shayne Currie’s Media Insider column in the New Zealand Herald, RNZ says it’s confident that Campbell is committed to impartial journalism and “like all employees of RNZ, will be held to that high standard through our comprehensive editorial policy”. At best, this is meaningless PR flannel; at worst, it’s plain dishonest. If Campbell has demonstrated anything in recent years, it’s that he’s incapable of impartial journalism. He doesn’t even believe in impartial journalism.

■ Currie also reports that Campbell’s appointment was the subject of “robust discussion” by the RNZ board, but that the directors ultimately deferred to Thompson’s right as CEO to make the call. It’s not hard to surmise which board members are likely to have supported the appointment and which of them resisted it. Those in the former category are likely to be gone once their current terms expire, but by then the damage will have been done to RNZ’s already tarnished reputation.

17 comments:

Tim Pankhurst said...

Spot on Karl. Should drive even more listeners away although the hand wringers will be happy.

Anonymous said...

Hear hear Karl

Hilary Taylor said...

I was reflecting this morning on the Paul Holmes era...the last time we were pretty much all on 'the same page'? Can't stand JC since I watched him suck up to David Bain on the steps of the courthouse here at the 2nd trial acquittal. Yech!

Eamon Sloan said...

John Campbell has somehow become Establishment almost, if I am allowed to use that word. Last man standing and all that. Iconic? No. Should we be grateful we didn’t get Patrick Gower?

Anonymous said...

I recommend an analysis of the "Boomer Journalism" that captured public broadcasting as early as the 1970s in Graham Majin's "Truthophobia" (2023). I made a summary in my review of Tim Watkin's "How to Rebuild Trust in Journalism" (https://www.nbr.co.nz/book-review/media-matters-rebuilding-public-trust/). Watkin works at RNZ. Majin was a former BBC journalist before turning to academia. His book is available on Kindle and is the best history I've seen of how the Victorian Liberal ethos of balanced and impartial ("who, what, where, when, how") journalism up to the 1960s was replaced by "why" - the desire to provide a narrative and solutions.

Karl du Fresne said...

That last comment was posted by Nevil Gibson, former managing editor of NBR. The clunky Blogger technology defeated his attempt to identify himself, as it has done with many others.

Aroha said...

John Campbell is so smug and self-righteous I can neither bear to listen to him or watch him.

Anonymous said...

Oh my goodness, Campbells performance after that trial was a national embarrassment.

ihcpcoro said...

There's something very toxic in that Wellington water, and it ain't flouride.

Anonymous said...

Great news- I will start listening to Morning report again - Corin Dan had turned it into a silly, chit chat show!

John Roy said...

Today’s Weekend Herald has interviews with the top dogs of NZ’S various media outfits, among them Paul Thompson from RNZ.

Claims he: “ …. we are reaching record audiences at a time when trust in RNZ is at its highest level.”

Yeah right. Every comment I read about RNZ is about how untrustworthy and biased it is, a view unlikely to be changed by the arrival of far-left John Campbell. Unlike the more commercial stations with bigger audiences, RNZ can continue on its merry way secure

Harry Young said...

He will fit like a hand in a glove.

Anonymous said...

I think they are preparing for another run in with NZF.
Does anyone recall the "racist brains" series of advertisements at the 1996 election? Did any of you see Helen Clark Foundation Report on social cohesion (NZrs attitudes to immigration)?. Paul Spoonley maintains we are 2/3rds in favor (I bet he is lying).

John Hurley said...

I think they are bringing in Campbell to counter Winston Peters: as much as Dr Spoonley informs us we are consistently 2/3rd's in favour of migration Helen Clark Foundation found a different story.
https://youtu.be/SYb041g5HuI
In the 1996 election they ran a "Racist Brains " campaign.
https://www.communityresearch.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/formidable/8/Refashioning_racism_Immigration_multicul.pdf

Anonymous said...

It's OK John Campbell can lead RNZ to the grave and bury it. Love to see that happen. When media suppresses truth, it signs its own imminent business death warrant. It'll be for the better.

D'Esterre said...

"Thompson is either tone-deaf or indifferent to public opinion."

While it's possible that he was leaned on over this appointment by senior staff, in my view it's more likely that he's become imbued with that same missionary zeal. He's made the appointment because, not in spite of, Campbell's modus operandi. These people sincerely believe that we should all think the way they do, and they evidently think that listeners will be converted (if they aren't already) by the likes of Campbell.

Where I live, I'm surrounded by public servants, both still serving and retired, and this appears to be the way they think. When we have conversations, I derive great enjoyment from chucking political spanners in the works.

I've long since stopped listening to RNZ, though I still listen to Concert (no adverts), and the few news bulletins are easily avoided. I occasionally complain about the music when (as is happening right now) they play Star Wars and the like, but for the most part, it's ok listening. Except for the obligatory Maorification: I've complained about that as well, but I suspect that they see it as being good for us. Or something...

Tim Watkin (mentioned upthread)? Didn't he have a blogsite at one time? Possibly still does. Some years back, a young relative referred unkindly to that site as a place where opinion goes to die.

D'Esterre said...

"flouride".... fluoride