When I was a boy growing up in a small Hawke’s Bay town,
every household would receive a free weekly guide to the films showing at the
local picture theatre.
There was a mini-review of each film and it became a
standing joke in our family that they were almost invariably described as
“heart-warming”.
As a result, I’ve never been able to use the term
“heart-warming” without a slightly derisive sneer. But a couple of days ago I
watched a film that really was heart-warming, in the sense that you left the
theatre feeling better about life and your fellow human beings than you might
have been when you walked in.
Gardening with Soul
is a feature-length documentary about Sister Loyola Galvin, who looks after the
gardens at the Home of Compassion in the Wellington suburb of Island Bay –
surely a challenging environment for even the greenest of fingers, given that
the soil is not naturally fertile (Sr Loyola’s garden survives only with
copious applications of home-made compost) and the climate often punishing.
Film maker Jess Feast spent a year observing Sister Loyola
and clearly formed a close and mutually affectionate bond with her. It’s a
simple film, beautifully shot and recorded. Every frame is impeccably composed,
yet there’s nothing arty or pretentious about it. Like the character at its
centre, it’s a no-nonsense piece of work.
Sister Loyola joined the Catholic order known as the
Daughters of Our Lady of Compassion in her mid-20s, after the man she expected
to marry went away to the Second World War and never came back. It can’t have
been an easy decision; her father, a Taranaki farmer to whom she was very devoted,
was firmly set against her entering the convent and took years to come around.
Now 90, Sister Loyola is slowed by age but mentally as sharp
as a new pin, with bright, bird-like eyes. She radiates wisdom and practical,
common-sense spirituality. Compassion, too, as you might expect, given the name
of the order she joined. She says – and
I hope I’m quoting her more or less accurately – that it’s possible to see God
in everyone, even the most unlikely people, if you look hard enough. If you
could bottle that attitude, you’d call it Essence of Christianity.
She’s also quite frank, and jokes that she’s safely past the
age when she risked being fired for speaking out of turn. She doesn’t
hesitate to say what she thinks, for example, about the scandal of sexual abuse
by Catholic priests.
I have encountered nuns like Sr Loyola before. The Catholic
Church, which I grew up in, has a tradition of strong – you might even say
stroppy – women. There’s no better example than Mother Suzanne Aubert, the
doughty Frenchwoman who founded the order to which Sr Loyola belongs.
Arriving in New Zealand in 1860, Aubert decided she hadn’t
come halfway around the world to teach French and embroidery to the daughters
of wealthy Aucklanders. Instead, she devoted herself to Maori and later to the
care of the orphaned, the unwanted, the destitute and the disabled.
In many cases, formidable women such as Aubert had to
overcome obstacles placed in their path by the male hierarchy of the Church.
You get the feeling that the nuns had a very clear idea of what needed to be
done and their male superiors often just got in the way. (For example, nuns
working in the backblocks were told they should ride their horses side-saddle,
in the interests of decorum – an instruction they sensibly ignored.)
There’s a moment in Gardening
with Soul when Sister Loyola, reflecting on the Catholic hierarchy, talks
about the nature of power. She doesn’t develop the idea but I wonder whether
she was gently suggesting that men, and more specifically the male fondness for
power, are problems for the Catholic Church.
If that’s indeed what she was talking about, it’s not just
Catholicism that has a problem with authoritarian male hierarchies.
I believe that most organised religion is largely about the
exercise of power and control, and these are usually – if not exclusively –
male preoccupations.
This is certainly true of faiths that are organised
hierarchically, whether it’s Catholicism, Judaism, Islam or Mormonism. In all
such religions, power is exercised by men – a striking anachronism in the modern
Western world, where women have otherwise rejected the notion of male control.
Only days ago I read that an Israeli woman had been ordered
by a religious court to have her son circumcised, against her will, or face
fines of nearly $200 a day for every day the procedure was not carried out.
It astonished me to learn that in Israel, which otherwise
gives the impression of being a modern, liberal democracy, rabbinical courts
have legal jurisdiction on religious issues. It almost goes without saying that
the rabbis involved are men, and that their edicts, if translated from
religious mumbo-jumbo, would read: “This is the way things must be done because,
er, because they’ve always been done this way. And besides, we say so.”
In fact, reading between the lines of the rabbinical court’s
ruling, what’s clear is that the rabbis were terrified that if one defiant soul
succeeded in breaking ranks, the power they have exercised unchallenged for centuries
might begin to crumble.
The article was accompanied by a photo showing a
circumcision ceremony taking place in a crowded synagogue. What was noticeable
was that virtually all the faces were male. Barely visible, at the very back of
the room, were a handful of women straining for a view of the proceedings. No
prizes for guessing who calls the shots, then.
In this respect, Judaism has much in common with Islam. The
blokes rule there, too, albeit in an even more repressive fashion.
Can Catholicism claim to be any better? Well, yes. Women do
have a say in the Church (as they do, no doubt, in the more liberal strands of
Judaism), but it’s extremely limited. Even amid the welcome winds of change
blowing through the Catholic Church since the election of the new pope, you
still get the impression it would be a cold day in Hell before the cardinals
and the bishops relinquished their hold on power.
But what a different Church it might be if the male hierarchy
were flattened and good, sensible women were allowed to get on with things
unimpeded.