(First published in The Dominion Post, June 5.)
A FRIEND of mine recently reminisced that the first time he
flew internationally, back in the 1960s, airline passengers dressed as if for a
Sunday church service or a race meeting. He wore a suit and tie.
I recall doing the same when I first flew to Australia in
1972. Back then, flying had an aura of glamour. There was even a special term –
“jet set” – for the elite who were privileged and affluent enough to fly
regularly.
How quaint that seems now. The only airline passengers wearing
suits and ties these days are the haunted-looking business types you see
anxiously checking their emails in the oppressive corporate ghetto known as the
Koru Club. Sensible long-haul passengers wear tee-shirts, track pants and
sneakers, recognising that any trip longer than four or five hours is an ordeal
more easily endured in loose, comfortable clothing.
Flying in the 21st century is about as exotic and
exciting as catching an Island Bay bus. The modern equivalents of the jet set
are safely insulated in first or business class, well away from the resentful eyes
of the lumpenproletariat. The rest of us travel in the modern equivalent of
steerage, the fetid lower decks where the poor were crammed together in
immigrant ships.
Air travel has become just another form of mass
transportation: pack the punters in like battery chooks and distract them with multiple
forms of in-flight entertainment in a futile attempt to maintain the pretence
that flying is still a pleasurable experience – that getting there is part of
the fun, rather than the endurance test it has become.
You may surmise correctly from this that I have recently
been on a long plane trip. If there were an alternative way of travelling long
distances, I’d happily take it, but it’s a curse inflicted on all New
Zealanders that flying is something we have to do if we want to travel anywhere.
It’s the price God exacts for living in His own country.
Is there any other nation on earth, I wonder, whose
inhabitants have to fly for more than three hours before seeing anything other
than water? Even Iceland, by comparison with New Zealand, is a mere hop away
from its nearest neighbour.
Yet I read recently that New Zealanders, per capita, are the
most travelled people in the world. You can put this down either to masochism
or to sheer, stubborn perversity.
ONE THING about long flights, mind you, is that they give
you ample time to ponder some of the peculiar things airlines do.
Why is it, for example, that when modern aircraft are so
technologically sophisticated that they can virtually fly themselves, their PA
systems are still so primitive?
On a domestic flight I took in the United States last week,
the softly-spoken flight attendant might as well have used semaphore to deliver
her safety briefing. No one could hear a word. At the other extreme, I’ve known
captains’ voices to come over the intercom at such ear-piercing volume that passengers’
teeth fell out.
I have also noted recently a propensity for airlines to
refer to their passengers as “guests”, as in: “At this time [airlines always
say “at this time”, never anything as prosaic as “now”] we will be boarding
guests in rows 1 to 16.”
Now let’s get this straight: hotels have guests, airlines
have passengers. I can only speculate that this new terminology, which sounds
like the work of marketing shamans, is aimed at making us feel more valued.
The word “guest” carries subtle connotations of being
pampered and cocooned. “Passenger”, on the other hand, implies simply being
carried passively from one point to another, much as a sheep is carted to the
abattoir. This is at odds with the image of air travel that airlines wish to
convey, which is one of luxury and indulgence.
And what about the issue of cabin baggage? Airlines
routinely make announcements about strict limits on the number and size of
carry-on bags, but I have yet to see anyone enforce them. It has become the
norm for passengers to struggle onto planes toting bags that far exceed the
stated allowance, then hold up everyone behind them as they try to stuff their
grossly oversized belongings into the overhead storage bins.
This is irritating enough in New Zealand but has reached truly
farcical proportions in the US, where airlines charge extra for checked
baggage. The inevitable result is that everyone tries to beat the charges by
carrying all their belongings on board.
I have a recurring
fantasy in which a cabin attendant – in my mind’s eye she would be a 180cm-tall
blonde with icily cold blue eyes and wearing a black, SS-style leather coat – seizes
one of these oversized bags and hurls it out onto the runway. And when the
passenger whines in protest, she pulls out a Luger and coolly shoots him in the
knee, IRA-style. That might make the baggage pests think twice.
1 comment:
I have seen Air New Zealand and British Airways confiscate over-sized bags at the gate and check them into the hold... and Easyjet and Ryanair have built a business model around refusing hand baggage; although admittedly those airlines are for the unterlumpenproletariat.
If you want the air hostesses to look like you describe in the final paragraph, I can heartily recommend flying SAS between London and Stockholm. You'd have to take your own Luger, mind.
Post a Comment