It’s well-known that you should never trust a journalist’s
arithmetic. Canny newspaper subeditors, a breed in danger of imminent
extinction, know this and always double-check reporters’ figures.
Not so widely realised is that journalists’ command of basic
geography is just as suspect. Only recently I read an article in which an
experienced journalist referred to the magnificent view of the Tararuas from a
house in Havelock North.
This weakness obviously extends to the people who write scripts
for TV reality shows such as Coastwatch,
which I happened to see last night. In the opening minutes the programme
referred to Titahi Bay as being on the Kapiti Coast – which starts at
Paekakariki, a good 15 kilometres north – and to a search for a missing crayfish
boat at Te Anau, which is 80 kilometres from the sea.
These may be relatively minor errors in the grand scheme of
things, but they are telling. Do the makers of these shows give a fig for
accuracy? I suspect not.
And don’t get me started on TV journalists’ rudimentary command
of basic grammar. My wife, for whom English was a third language, could barely
believe her ears when she heard a reporter say on TVNZ’s 6 pm bulletin on
Saturday that oil companies had “risen their prices”. God preserve us.
1 comment:
Ahem, while you're lecturing the telly journos, you might slip a note to the Dom hacks and explain the difference between historic and historical, oh, and infer and imply and ...
Post a Comment