I wonder if anyone else felt uneasy reading the
story on Stuff today about a Taranaki nurse, Deborah Hugill,
who was deregistered by the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal for
making racist comments.
Hugill was held to be guilty of professional
misconduct after a social media post – prompted by a news report about the
absence of Maori voices from a mental health and addictions inquiry – in which
she described Maori nurses as lazy, cunning and underhanded [sic]. She also said
they got a lot of unfair handouts and spent too much time eating and going to
meetings.
It was a statement that even staunch upholders of
the right to free speech would have trouble defending, and Hugill asked for
trouble by posting it on a New Zealand Nurses Organisation’s Facebook page. Yet Stuff’s
account of the tribunal hearing left the discomforting impression that the
proceedings had the hallmarks of a show trial.
The tribunal chair, Maria Dew QC, rebuked Hugill for
her “failure to show a sustained and genuine understanding or remorse for her
highly offensive and racist comments”. That suggests she was punished not just
for her offence but for not being sufficiently contrite.
Dew also acknowledged “mana whenua” – by which she
apparently meant local Maori, though that’s not the Maori Dictionary’s
definition of the term – for their “very special contribution” to the hearing,
saying it was important for the tribunal to be part of restoring mana for
Maori. “Ms Hugill’s conduct has damaged that mana.”
Really? I would have thought the purpose of the
Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal was to ensure professional standards
are upheld. Restoring mana for Maori
suggests a broader agenda that goes beyond the tribunal’s warrant. This is fashionable
ideological rhetoric, not the dispassionate language expected from a
quasi-judicial body. Was this a case of the tribunal buying into the culture of
grievance and victimhood?
Perhaps it was Hugill’s misfortune to be subjected
to disciplinary proceedings at a time when confected fury over supposed white
supremacy, fanned by the Black Lives Matter movement, has fuelled an appetite
for retribution against anyone bold or foolish enough (and this case involved a
bit of both) to expose themselves to charges of racism.
Cherene Neilson-Hornblow, who laid the complaint
against Hugill, told the tribunal that Hugill had “trampled on the heads of our
people”. Later, when the hearing was over, she said: “I’m just overwhelmed, I’m
so pleased. It’s thousands of years of injustices, it’s tears of joy.”
Hyperbole, much? Remember, we’re not talking about the righting of grievous
historic wrongs here. We’re talking about a lone woman who expressed racially
offensive (but, we must presume, sincerely held) opinions and has paid what
some would regard as a disproportionate penalty.
As well as having her registration cancelled, Hugill
was formally censured and ordered to pay 15 per cent of the costs of the
hearing: $8362.95. She was barred from practising for two years and before
working as a nurse again must complete what Stuff
called a cultural confidence course (I think they mean cultural competence). Used punitively, as appears
to be the case here, this is a more benign form of the re-education camps
favoured by Pol Pot and the current Chinese communist regime: a means of moral
purification by which ideological transgressors are persuaded to see the error
of their ways and given a chance to purge themselves of their sins.
Stuff
also
reported that after the tribunal had come to its decision, proceedings were
closed with a karakia. Well, of course.
