Last Saturday I heard Noelle McCarthy, filling in for Kim
Hill on her Saturday morning radio show, interview the American abortion
careerist Dr Patricia Lohr, who runs Britain’s Pregnancy Advisory Service.
(Actually, judging by the interview, that’s a misnomer: if they were honest,
they would call it the Abortion Advisory Service, or perhaps the Pregnancy Termination
Service).
It was less an interview than an empathising session, since
McCarthy and Lohr were clearly of one mind, whether welcoming the “inspirational”
result of the recent Irish referendum on abortion or lamenting the obstacles women
wanting an abortion are still said to face because …. well, actually, because
society views the termination of a life, even in the womb, as a pretty serious
matter, although anyone hoping this “interview” might explore some of the
profound moral questions around abortion would have been sorely disappointed. McCarthy and Lohr gave the impression the only
moral right in play here is women’s right to have a pregnancy terminated
without delay and preferably with no questions asked. I’m surprised no one has
proposed drive-in abortion clinics; 10 minutes, no waiting. Perhaps they have.
What struck me most while listening to McCarthy and Lohr is
that in a 28-minute discussion about abortion, they somehow managed to avoid a
single reference to the word “baby” or even “foetus”. The abortion debate has evidently
been so totally captured by feminist ideology, and so successfully framed as
solely an issue of women’s rights, that the unborn baby is not only not at the
centre of the procedure, but has been erased from the picture altogether. How
convenient. Excluding the baby from the conversation neatly gets around messy questions
about the morality of extinguishing a human life.
The closest Lohr got to mentioning babies was when she spoke
of women “passing the pregnancy” (I think she meant "getting rid of the baby") at home. This is another euphemism that neatly dehumanises
the foetus - anything to avoid acknowledging the awkward truth and ease the
conscience of those carrying out the procedure.
If you check out the Radio New Zealand website, you’ll see the
interview is headlined “Better abortion laws”. But better for whom? Certainly not
the unborn child.
